Blueprint Playbook for PureFacts

Who the Hell is Jordan Crawford?

Founder of Blueprint. I help companies stop sending emails nobody wants to read.

The problem with outbound isn't the message. It's the list. When you know WHO to target and WHY they need you right now, the message writes itself.

I built this system using government databases, public records, and 25 million job posts to find pain signals most companies miss. Predictable Revenue is dead. Data-driven intelligence is what works now.

The Old Way (What Everyone Does)

Your GTM team is buying lists from ZoomInfo, adding "personalization" like mentioning a LinkedIn post, then blasting generic messages about features. Here's what it actually looks like:

The Typical PureFacts SDR Email:

Subject: Optimize Your Fee Revenue with PureFacts Hi [First Name], I noticed your firm recently expanded its wealth management services. Congratulations on the growth! At PureFacts, we help financial institutions like yours optimize fee-based revenue and gain real-time profitability insights. Our platform has helped firms achieve up to 65% revenue growth. Would you be open to a quick call next week to discuss how we can help [Company Name] maximize your revenue potential? Best, [SDR Name]

Why this fails: The prospect is an expert. They've seen this template 1,000 times. There's zero indication you understand their specific situation. Delete.

The New Way: Intelligence-Driven GTM

Blueprint flips the approach. Instead of interrupting prospects with pitches, you deliver insights so valuable they'd pay consulting fees to receive them.

1. Hard Data Over Soft Signals

Stop: "I see you're hiring compliance people" (job postings - everyone sees this)

Start: "Your Q3 5300 filing shows non-member revenue at 8.2% vs 12.1% peer average" (government database with specific filing numbers)

2. Mirror Situations, Don't Pitch Solutions

PQS (Pain-Qualified Segment): Reflect their exact situation with such specificity they think "how did you know?" Use government data with dates, record numbers, filing periods.

PVP (Permissionless Value Proposition): Deliver immediate value they can use today - analysis already done, benchmarks already calculated, patterns already identified - whether they buy or not.

PureFacts Overview

Company: PureFacts

Core Problem: Financial services organizations struggle to maximize revenue and optimize operational efficiency due to fragmented financial data and inability to derive actionable insights from complex financial metrics.

Product Type: B2B SaaS - Financial Analytics Platform

Target ICP: Mid-market to large financial institutions ($100M+ AUM or $500M+ assets under administration) including retail banking, investment banking, wealth management, asset management, credit unions, and insurance companies with multiple revenue streams and complex product portfolios requiring revenue attribution.

Primary Buyer Personas: Chief Financial Officer, VP of Revenue Optimization, Director of Financial Analytics, Head of Business Intelligence, Chief Operating Officer, Senior Vice President of Finance

Key Urgency Triggers: Quarterly/annual revenue performance reviews revealing underperforming revenue streams, competitive pressure requiring improved profitability margins, regulatory compliance requirements demanding detailed financial reporting, digital transformation initiatives requiring modern financial analytics infrastructure, cost reduction mandates necessitating operational efficiency improvements.

Validated Segments

These segments passed all 6 Blueprint gates. Each segment is backed by specific data sources and offers either a painful situation (PQS) or proprietary value (PVP).

PVP Public + Internal Strong

Credit Unions with Non-Member Revenue Below Peer Benchmarks

What's the segment?

Credit unions showing non-member revenue percentages significantly below peer institutions in their asset class. This segment combines public NCUA call report data with PureFacts' proprietary aggregated revenue data from their customer base to show credit unions exactly where they're leaving money on the table.

Data Sources
  1. Company Internal Data: Aggregated non-member revenue percentage and product mix data from PureFacts customers, segmented by credit union asset size
  2. NCUA Credit Union Call Report Data: member_service_earnings, total_assets, operating_expenses
Why this qualifies

This is a true PVP because PureFacts has proprietary insight into what successful credit unions achieve in non-member revenue across different asset classes. The prospect cannot get this benchmarking data from any public source. It provides immediate, actionable value by showing them exactly how much revenue opportunity exists and where it's coming from.

DATA REQUIREMENT

This play requires aggregated non-member revenue percentages and product mix data from PureFacts customers, segmented by credit union asset size and showing median/quartile performance by revenue category (investment services, business services, fee income).

This is proprietary data only you have - competitors cannot replicate this play.
PVP Public + Internal Strong

Investment Advisers with Fee Realization Gaps on Multi-Service Bundles

What's the segment?

SEC-registered investment advisers offering multi-service bundles (advisory + trading + custody, or advisory + tax prep + estate planning) who are experiencing fee realization gaps - the difference between configured fees and actually collected revenue. This targets advisers with complex fee structures who are unknowingly losing revenue through billing calculation errors or service delivery misalignment.

Data Sources
  1. Company Internal Data: Aggregated fee realization data (actual collected vs configured fees) across PureFacts customer base, broken down by product bundle type and AUM tier
  2. SEC Form ADV Data: fee_structure, aum_total, advisory_services_offered
Why this qualifies

This is a true PVP because PureFacts has visibility into actual fee realization rates across hundreds of investment advisers - data that's completely invisible in public filings. By showing an adviser their fee realization gap compared to peers with similar AUM and service bundles, PureFacts delivers immediate, quantifiable value. The prospect learns exactly how much revenue they're leaving on the table and where the leakage is occurring, all without needing to buy anything.

DATA REQUIREMENT

This play requires aggregated fee realization data (actual collected vs configured fees) across PureFacts customer base, broken down by product bundle type and AUM tier, showing median collection rates and identifying specific leakage points in fee calculation workflows.

This is proprietary data only you have - competitors cannot replicate this play.

PureFacts Intelligence Plays

These messages demonstrate either precise understanding of the prospect's current situation (PQS) or deliver immediate actionable value (PVP). Every claim traces to specific data sources with verifiable fields.

PVP Internal Data Strong (9.3/10)

Estate Planning Services Without Advisory Fee Capture

What's the play?

Use integrated custodian feed data to identify clients receiving estate planning services but not showing advisory fee billing. This demonstrates deep data integration capability while revealing immediate revenue recovery opportunity.

Why this works

This message creates instant urgency because it identifies specific clients (by count) where the adviser is delivering services but not capturing fees. The specificity of "43 clients use estate planning but only 31 show advisory fee billing" proves access to their actual data. The offer to provide client IDs makes it immediately actionable - they can fix this today and recover lost revenue.

Data Sources
  1. SEC Form ADV Data: advisory_services_offered (to confirm estate planning is offered)
  2. Company Internal Data: Custodian feed integration showing client-level service usage and fee billing records

The message:

Subject: Your estate planning clients aren't all paying advisory fees Cross-referenced your ADV services with your custodian feed - 43 clients use your estate planning but only 31 show advisory fee billing. That's 12 clients receiving services without corresponding fee capture. Want the list of client IDs?
⚠️ EXISTING CUSTOMER PLAY

This play requires the recipient's historical data from your system (custodian feed integration showing client-level service usage and fee billing records).

Only works for upselling existing customers, not cold acquisition.
PVP Internal Data Strong (9.1/10)

Clients Overpaying Due to Unbundled Service Billing

What's the play?

Identify clients receiving bundled services but being billed separately at rates higher than the bundle price. This protects the adviser's fiduciary responsibility while demonstrating data analysis capability.

Why this works

This message reframes the conversation from "you're losing money" to "your clients are overpaying and you need to fix this." It appeals to the adviser's fiduciary duty to act in clients' best interests. The specificity of "$900 overpayment per client, 22 clients, $19,800 total" makes it concrete and urgent. This protects the adviser from potential compliance issues and demonstrates that PureFacts cares about their clients, not just revenue extraction.

Data Sources
  1. Company Internal Data: Fee schedules and service delivery records to identify billing discrepancies where clients pay separate fees totaling more than bundle rate

The message:

Subject: 22 clients pay separate fees for bundled services Analyzed your fee schedule against service delivery records - 22 clients receive investment management + tax prep but pay separate fees totaling $4,100 vs your $3,200 bundle rate. They're overpaying by $900 each - $19,800 total annually. Want the client list to fix the billing?
⚠️ EXISTING CUSTOMER PLAY

This play requires the recipient's historical data from your system (fee schedules and service delivery records to identify billing discrepancies).

Only works for upselling existing customers, not cold acquisition.
PVP Internal Data Strong (8.9/10)

Top Clients Underpaying Based on Fee Schedule

What's the play?

Analyze top AUM clients' actual fees paid against published fee schedule to identify billing gaps. This targets revenue optimization for the adviser's most valuable relationships.

Why this works

This message focuses on the adviser's top 10 clients - their most important relationships and largest revenue contributors. A $67K collective underpayment among top clients is significant and immediately actionable. The framing "either your fee schedule is outdated or billing needs adjustment" provides two possible explanations without assigning blame. The offer of client-by-client breakdown demonstrates granular analysis capability and makes the next step clear.

Data Sources
  1. Company Internal Data: Client-level AUM data and fee billing records to compare against published fee schedules

The message:

Subject: Your top 10 clients paid $67K less than they should have Analyzed your top 10 AUM clients against your published fee schedule - they collectively paid $67K less than the schedule indicates. Either your fee schedule is outdated or billing needs adjustment. Want the client-by-client breakdown?
⚠️ EXISTING CUSTOMER PLAY

This play requires the recipient's historical data from your system (client-level AUM data and fee billing records to compare against published fee schedules).

Only works for upselling existing customers, not cold acquisition.
PVP Public + Internal Strong (8.7/10)

Credit Union Parking Lot Revenue Opportunity

What's the play?

Identify credit unions with owned parking lots (from property records) and calculate potential non-member revenue from leasing weekend/evening spaces to rideshare drivers based on local commercial parking rates.

Why this works

This message demonstrates creative thinking about non-member revenue that the credit union likely hasn't considered. The specificity of "1840 Commerce Drive" and "120-space parking lot" proves real research was done. The "$48K with zero member impact" framing addresses the credit union's core concern about serving members while generating revenue. The broker contact offer makes it immediately actionable without needing to buy PureFacts' product.

Data Sources
  1. County Property Records: Property ownership, lot size, parking capacity
  2. Local Commercial Data: Comparable parking lot lease rates by ZIP code
  3. Company Internal Data (optional): Parking lease broker relationships

The message:

Subject: Your parking lot could generate $48K annually Your credit union owns the property at 1840 Commerce Drive with 120-space parking lot. Comparable commercial lots in your ZIP lease weekend/evening spaces to rideshare drivers for $400/month - that's $48K with zero member impact. Want the contact for the parking lease broker?
DATA REQUIREMENT

This play requires property records research combined with local commercial parking rate data and broker relationships.

Combined with public property records to identify underutilized assets. This synthesis is unique to your business.
PVP Internal Data Strong (8.6/10)

Business Members Without Merchant Services

What's the play?

Cross-reference credit union member business accounts with merchant services enrollment to identify existing business members who aren't using the credit union's merchant processing services.

Why this works

This message identifies a concrete revenue opportunity with existing members - warm relationships where trust is already established. The specificity of "340 business members, only 23 use merchant services" proves data analysis capability. The "$27K monthly opportunity" calculation makes the revenue potential tangible. The offer to provide a list of business members without merchant services makes it immediately actionable - the credit union can start member conversations today.

Data Sources
  1. Company Internal Data: Member account data showing business account holders and merchant services enrollment status

The message:

Subject: Your 340 business members aren't using merchant services Cross-referenced your member business accounts with merchant services enrollment - only 23 of 340 business members use your merchant processing. At $85/month average merchant revenue, that's $27K monthly opportunity with existing members. Want the list of business members without merchant services?
⚠️ EXISTING CUSTOMER PLAY

This play requires the recipient's historical data from your system (member account data showing business account holders and merchant services enrollment status).

Only works for upselling existing customers, not cold acquisition.
PVP Public + Internal Strong (8.4/10)

Regional CUSOs Monetizing Member Data

What's the play?

Identify credit unions in the prospect's metro area that have launched Credit Union Service Organizations (CUSOs) for monetizing aggregated member financial data. Provide concrete examples with revenue ranges and offer direct contact information.

Why this works

This message provides specific, actionable peer examples rather than generic benchmarks. The framing "three credit unions in your metro" makes it locally relevant and immediately believable. The "$200K-$400K annually without adding staff" addresses two key concerns: revenue opportunity and operational feasibility. The offer to provide CUSO manager contact info makes it zero-friction for the prospect to learn more - they can simply call a peer who's already doing this successfully.

Data Sources
  1. NCUA Charter Filings: CUSO formations, business purpose, sponsoring credit unions
  2. Company Internal Data (optional): Revenue data on which CUSOs are generating non-member income

The message:

Subject: 3 CUSOs in your region monetizing member data Three credit unions in your metro launched CUSOs in the past 18 months - all monetizing aggregated member financial data for lenders. Each generates $200K-$400K annually in non-member income without adding staff. Want the contact info for their CUSO managers?
DATA REQUIREMENT

This play requires research into regional credit union CUSO formations via NCUA charter filings and potentially internal data on which CUSOs are generating non-member revenue.

Combined with public NCUA filings to identify peer strategies. This synthesis is unique to your business.
PQS Public Data Okay (7.8/10)

Tax Prep Clients Without Bundled Advisory Relationships

What's the play?

Cross-reference SEC Form ADV (showing advisory services offered) with state tax preparer registrations to identify advisers serving tax clients who don't have bundled advisory relationships. This reveals fee structure integration opportunity.

Why this works

This message synthesizes two public data sources (ADV and tax preparer registration) to calculate a specific dollar opportunity. The specificity of "87 tax clients but only 52 show bundled advisory relationships" demonstrates real analysis. The "$112K in unbundled tax-only clients" calculation makes the opportunity concrete. The routing question "Is someone reviewing fee structure integration?" is low-pressure and easy to forward internally.

Data Sources
  1. SEC Form ADV Data: advisory_services_offered (showing tax preparation is offered)
  2. State Tax Preparer Registration: Number of tax clients served

The message:

Subject: Your tax prep clients show $180K fee gap Pulled your ADV and tax preparer registration - you serve 87 tax clients but only 52 show bundled advisory relationships. At your $3,200 average advisory fee, that's $112K in unbundled tax-only clients. Is someone reviewing fee structure integration?

What Changes

Old way: Spray generic messages at job titles. Hope someone replies.

New way: Use public data to find companies in specific painful situations. Then mirror that situation back to them with evidence.

Why this works: When you lead with "Your Q3 5300 filing shows non-member revenue at 8.2% - peer credit unions average 12.1%" instead of "I see you're expanding services," you're not another sales email. You're the person who did the homework.

The messages above aren't templates. They're examples of what happens when you combine real data sources with specific situations. Your team can replicate this using the data recipes in each play.

Data Sources Reference

Every play traces back to verifiable public data. Here are the sources used in this playbook:

Source Key Fields Used For
FDIC Call Report Data institution_name, total_assets, total_revenue, net_income, cost_to_income_ratio, return_on_assets, net_interest_margin, provision_for_loan_losses, non_interest_income, quarterly_data Community Banks, State-Chartered Commercial Banks
NCUA Credit Union Call Report Data credit_union_name, total_assets, member_deposits, net_income, operating_expenses, loan_portfolio_composition, non_member_revenue, member_service_earnings, quarterly_call_report_data, year_over_year_growth Federal Credit Unions, State-Chartered Credit Unions
SEC Form ADV Data adviser_name, aum_total, aum_by_strategy, fee_structure, employees, advisory_services_offered, discretionary_vs_nondiscretionary, subsidiary_relationships, regulatory_history, filing_date Investment Advisers, Multi-Family Offices, Private Fund Advisers
SEC Form 13F Holdings Data manager_name, reporting_period, equity_holdings, market_value, shares_outstanding, holding_changes_quarterly, sector_allocation, portfolio_concentration, filing_date Investment Advisers, Mutual Fund Complexes, Private Fund Advisers
FINRA BrokerCheck firm_name, registration_status, disciplinary_history, customer_complaints, regulatory_actions, financial_condition, locations, disclosure_events Broker-Dealers, FINRA Member Firms
NAIC Insurance Regulatory Database insurer_name, statutory_financial_statements, premiums_by_line_of_business, investment_income, loss_reserves, regulatory_capital, quarterly_financial_data, state_licensing_status Life Insurance Companies, Variable Annuity Providers
Federal Reserve Stress Test Results bank_name, stressed_capital_ratios, stress_test_scenario, revenue_projections_under_stress, loss_estimates, regulatory_capital_requirements, bank_size_category, annual_results Community Banks, State-Chartered Commercial Banks